PortfoliosLab logo
NCSM vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NCSM and FANG is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NCSM vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NCSM:

1.34

FANG:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

NCSM:

2.08

FANG:

-0.72

Omega Ratio

NCSM:

1.27

FANG:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

NCSM:

0.83

FANG:

-0.61

Martin Ratio

NCSM:

6.96

FANG:

-1.37

Ulcer Index

NCSM:

11.56%

FANG:

18.89%

Daily Std Dev

NCSM:

63.03%

FANG:

39.17%

Max Drawdown

NCSM:

-98.58%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

NCSM:

-94.06%

FANG:

-29.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NCSM:

$83.80M

FANG:

$42.03B

EPS

NCSM:

$3.24

FANG:

$16.08

PE Ratio

NCSM:

10.18

FANG:

8.89

PEG Ratio

NCSM:

0.00

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

NCSM:

0.50

FANG:

3.40

PB Ratio

NCSM:

0.77

FANG:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

NCSM:

$168.90M

FANG:

$12.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NCSM:

$67.87M

FANG:

$8.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

NCSM:

$13.89M

FANG:

$8.98B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCSM achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -10.15% return.


NCSM

YTD

23.78%

1M

26.66%

6M

37.68%

1Y

82.27%

5Y*

28.12%

10Y*

N/A

FANG

YTD

-10.15%

1M

13.30%

6M

-17.77%

1Y

-24.69%

5Y*

36.59%

10Y*

8.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NCSM vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NCSM is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NCSM is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NCSM is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NCSM is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NCSM is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NCSM is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NCSM vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NCSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCSM and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NCSM vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

NCSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.25%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%

Drawdowns

NCSM vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCSM drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCSM and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NCSM vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) has a higher volatility of 25.17% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 11.78%. This indicates that NCSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NCSM vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
50.01M
4.05B
(NCSM) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NCSM vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
43.7%
91.6%
(NCSM) Gross Margin
(FANG) Gross Margin
NCSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.86M and revenue of 50.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.7%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

NCSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.29M and revenue of 50.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

NCSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.06M and revenue of 50.01M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.