NCLH vs. T

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. NCLH operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, NCLH returned -6.77%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for T. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NCLH vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLH achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than T's -9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLH has underperformed T with an annualized return of -6.77%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.

NCLH

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 22.94%
• YTD: -10.22%
• 6M: -17.43%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 1.09%
• 5Y*: -8.36%
• 10Y*: -6.77%

T

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -12.51%
• YTD: -9.05%
• 6M: -7.03%
• 1Y: -16.95%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 2.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLH vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	-10.22%	-13.25%	28.39%	63.73%	-40.98%	-18.44%	-56.46%	37.79%	-20.39%	25.21%
T AT&T Inc.	-9.05%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.09%	-21.37%	45.55%	-22.25%	-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLH and T is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2013	0.21

The correlation between NCLH and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS NCLH : $1.22 T : $3.04
PE Ratio NCLH : 16.45 T : 7.26
PEG Ratio NCLH : 0.23 T : 0.30
PS Ratio NCLH : 0.93 T : 1.26
Total Revenue (TTM) NCLH : $10.03B T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) NCLH : $4.32B T : $105.41B
EBITDA (TTM) NCLH : $2.38B T : $54.70B

Return for Risk

NCLH vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLH

NCLH Risk / Return Rank: 45
NCLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NCLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NCLH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NCLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NCLH Martin Ratio Rank: 45

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 11
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
T Omega Ratio Rank: 13
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
T Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLH vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCLH	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	-0.76	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	-0.99	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.89	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	-0.72	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	-1.54	+1.82

NCLH vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLH and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCLH vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLH drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLH and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCLH	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.81%	-64.15%	-23.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.10%	-23.57%	-21.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.12%	-23.57%	-25.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.55%	-32.01%	-34.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.25%	-42.35%	-44.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.57%	-23.26%	-45.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.02%	-15.72%	-24.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.69%	11.06%	+10.63%

Volatility

NCLH vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a higher volatility of 14.37% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 7.92%. This indicates that NCLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCLH	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.37%	7.92%	+6.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.10%	18.08%	+25.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.34%	22.46%	+30.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.75%	24.08%	+33.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.10%	23.77%	+38.33%

Dividends

NCLH vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NCLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
T AT&T Inc.	5.02%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCLH and T in my portfolio?

NCLH and T have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCLH or T?

NCLH has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to T (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLH dropped -87.81% vs T's -64.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.