NCLH vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, NCLH returned -7.50%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for SMH. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

NCLH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLH achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLH has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -7.50%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.

NCLH

• 1D: 6.64%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: -16.41%
• YTD: -11.47%
• 1Y: -19.35%
• 3Y*: 3.25%
• 5Y*: -2.65%
• 10Y*: -7.50%
• ALL TIME*: -1.75%

SMH

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -7.91%
• 6M: 33.70%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 1Y: 92.69%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: 32.99%
• 10Y*: 33.99%
• ALL TIME*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	$347.22M	$289.69M	$360.90M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.29B	$7.23B	$7.12B

NCLH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	-11.47%	-13.25%	28.39%	63.73%	-40.98%	-18.44%	-56.46%	37.79%	-20.39%	25.21%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	51.46%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLH and SMH is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2013	0.38

The correlation between NCLH and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NCLH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCLH

NCLH Risk / Return Rank: 28
NCLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NCLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NCLH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NCLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NCLH Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCLH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NCLH	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	2.43	-2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	2.80	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.37	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	3.79	-4.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	15.18	-16.01

NCLH vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLH Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLH and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NCLH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLH drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLH and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCLH	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.81%	-84.96%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.10%	-24.62%	-20.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.12%	-35.74%	-13.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.11%	-45.30%	-18.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.25%	-45.30%	-41.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.01%	-18.46%	-50.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.27%	-40.89%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.46%	6.13%	+17.33%

Volatility

NCLH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a higher volatility of 17.35% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.15%. This indicates that NCLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCLH	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.35%	14.15%	+3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.10%	32.94%	+10.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.09%	38.50%	+15.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.62%	36.51%	+21.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.17%	33.33%	+28.84%

Dividends

NCLH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NCLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCLH and SMH in my portfolio?

NCLH and SMH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NCLH or SMH?

NCLH has higher volatility (17.35%) compared to SMH (14.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLH dropped -87.81% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.