NCLH vs. SMH

In the year-to-date period, NCLH achieves a 31.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 43.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLH has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -5.70%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.79% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NCLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLH and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither NCLH nor SMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum NCLH drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLH and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 8.51%. This indicates that NCLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.