NASL.L vs. UC96.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L).
NASL.L and UC96.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NASL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. UC96.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. It was launched on Aug 26, 2015. Both NASL.L and UC96.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NASL.L or UC96.L.
Key characteristics
| NASL.L | UC96.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.36% | 8.23% |
| 1Y Return | 19.84% | 14.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.65% | 10.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.22% | 11.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | 1.43 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.24% | 10.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.49% | -26.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.19% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASL.L and UC96.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 8.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison
NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.69% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, roughly equal to the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and UC96.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NASL.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) at 3.94%. This indicates that NASL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.