NASD.L vs. BRK-B
NASD.L (Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, NASD.L returned 17.79%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NASD.L achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.78% return.
NASD.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 19.73% | 19.87% | 26.82% | 56.40% | -33.39% | 28.25% | 48.47% | 38.09% | -8.81% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.78% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASD.L and BRK-B is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between NASD.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASD.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
NASD.L
BRK-B
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NASD.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.98 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | -0.27 | +3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | -0.57 | +13.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASD.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | -0.18 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.61 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.48 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASD.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASD.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -53.86% | +18.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -9.42% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.36% | -14.95% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -26.58% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -11.33% | +10.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -11.07% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 4.46% | -1.42% |
Volatility
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD (NASD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.72%. This indicates that NASD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASD.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.72% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 10.70% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 14.32% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 17.11% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 19.43% | +1.81% |
Dividends
NASD.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASD.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASD.L Lyxor Nasdaq-100 Ucits ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASD.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NASD.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer