NAPA vs. AAP
Compare and contrast key facts about The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA) and Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NAPA or AAP.
Key characteristics
| NAPA | AAP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -16.95% | 23.84% |
| 1Y Return | -43.27% | -38.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -21.65% | -26.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.27 | -0.74 |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.30% | 53.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.93% | -78.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -65.93% | -66.91% |
Fundamentals
| NAPA | AAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $4.55B |
| EPS | $0.57 | $0.50 |
| PE Ratio | 13.79 | 152.62 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $396.89M | $11.29B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $215.69M | $4.96B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $135.30M | $420.83M |
Correlation
The correlation between NAPA and AAP is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
NAPA vs. AAP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NAPA achieves a -16.95% return, which is significantly lower than AAP's 23.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NAPA vs. AAP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA) and Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NAPA vs. AAP - Dividend Comparison
NAPA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAPA The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AAP Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | 1.33% | 3.28% | 4.08% | 1.35% | 0.63% | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
NAPA vs. AAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAPA drawdown since its inception was -67.93%, smaller than the maximum AAP drawdown of -78.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAPA and AAP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NAPA vs. AAP - Volatility Comparison
The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) at 10.95%. This indicates that NAPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NAPA vs. AAP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. and Advance Auto Parts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities