NANR vs. PAVE
NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NANR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NANR returned 16.21%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NANR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
NANR vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANR achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 19.88% return.
NANR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 53.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
NANR vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 24.07% | 35.35% | 2.31% | -3.23% | 26.49% | 36.43% | 1.03% | 18.99% | -16.77% | 12.11% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANR and PAVE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between NANR and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NANR vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NANR
PAVE
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Basic Materials
NANR
PAVE
Energy
NANR
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
NANR
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
NANR
PAVE
Real Estate
NANR
PAVE
-
Technology
NANR
PAVE
Industrials
NANR
PAVE
Utilities
NANR
PAVE
Communication Services
NANR
-
PAVE
-
Financial Services
NANR
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
NANR
-
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NANR vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
NANR
PAVE
NANR vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NANR | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.04 | 3.13 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.31 | 11.50 | +9.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NANR | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98 | 1.99 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
NANR vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANR drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANR and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANR | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -44.08% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.91% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -26.23% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -26.23% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.82% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -6.24% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.24% | -0.71% |
Volatility
NANR vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is 4.92%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that NANR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NANR | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 6.42% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 15.17% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 18.84% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 21.60% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 24.38% | -0.84% |
NANR vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
NANR vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
NANR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.69% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NANR and PAVE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to NANR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANR dropped -49.15% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs 16.21% for NANR. On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 16.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
NANR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NANR and 0.47% for PAVE.
NANR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NANR and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer