NABL vs. CLS
NABL (N-able, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — NABL in Information Technology Services, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 3 years, NABL returned -36.14%/yr vs 226.85%/yr for CLS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NABL vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NABL achieves a -49.33% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 54.98% return.
NABL
- 1D
- -9.11%
- 1M
- -31.34%
- YTD
- -49.33%
- 6M
- -49.13%
- 1Y
- -52.62%
- 3Y*
- -36.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 54.98%
- 6M
- 48.55%
- 1Y
- 277.82%
- 3Y*
- 226.85%
- 5Y*
- 121.36%
- 10Y*
- 45.51%
NABL vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NABL N-able, Inc. | -49.33% | -19.91% | -29.51% | 28.89% | -7.39% | -11.20% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 54.98% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 53.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between NABL and CLS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between NABL and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NABL:
$710.80M
CLS:
$53.01B
NABL:
-$0.06
CLS:
$8.28
NABL:
1.36
CLS:
3.84
NABL:
0.89
CLS:
25.26
NABL:
$522.67M
CLS:
$13.81B
NABL:
$409.63M
CLS:
$1.60B
NABL:
$83.42M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NABL vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
NABL
CLS
NABL vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for N-able, Inc. (NABL) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NABL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | 3.96 | -4.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | 3.41 | -4.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.46 | -0.65 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 9.57 | -10.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.92 | 24.15 | -26.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NABL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 3.96 | -4.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.28 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
NABL vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NABL drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NABL and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NABL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -96.93% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.94% | -29.24% | -31.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.26% | -53.96% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.58% | -3.02% | -72.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.31% | -73.38% | +42.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.40% | 11.57% | +15.83% |
Volatility
NABL vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
N-able, Inc. (NABL) has a higher volatility of 29.49% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 22.24%. This indicates that NABL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NABL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.49% | 22.24% | +7.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.46% | 53.06% | -9.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.30% | 70.76% | -19.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.90% | 57.21% | -12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.90% | 49.69% | -4.79% |
Dividends
NABL vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither NABL nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NABL vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between N-able, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NABL vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
NABL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, N-able, Inc. reported a gross profit of 101.92M and revenue of 129.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
NABL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, N-able, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.46M and revenue of 129.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
NABL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, N-able, Inc. reported a net income of -615.00K and revenue of 129.43M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NABL and CLS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NABL has higher volatility (29.49%) compared to CLS (22.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NABL dropped -78.61% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NABL and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer