NA.TO vs. MUFG
Compare and contrast key facts about National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG).
Performance
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 5.02% | 36.15% | 35.91% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 8.45% | 33.54% | 52.13% | 30.56% | 36.45% | 24.57% | -17.41% | 6.02% | -27.33% | 13.28% |
Different Trading Currencies
NA.TO is traded in CAD, while MUFG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MUFG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
NA.TO:
CA$71.06B
MUFG:
$193.98B
NA.TO:
CA$10.82
MUFG:
$169.11
NA.TO:
16.64
MUFG:
0.10
NA.TO:
4.66
MUFG:
0.00
NA.TO:
2.64
MUFG:
0.02
NA.TO:
2.32
MUFG:
0.01
NA.TO:
CA$26.97B
MUFG:
$12.45T
NA.TO:
CA$13.68B
MUFG:
$5.45T
NA.TO:
CA$6.07B
MUFG:
$2.57T
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO has outperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 20.26%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.55% annualized return.
NA.TO
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.00%
- 5Y*
- 20.69%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
MUFG
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.52%
- 5Y*
- 32.12%
- 10Y*
- 17.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA.TO vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank
NA.TO
MUFG
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NA.TO | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.12 | 0.73 | +2.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.21 | 1.13 | +3.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.15 | +0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 1.02 | +3.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.65 | 3.02 | +16.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NA.TO | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 0.73 | +2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.17 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.65 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between NA.TO and MUFG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison
NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than MUFG's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.69% | 2.75% | 4.17% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1.33% | 3.12% | 2.50% | 2.90% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.20% | 2.70% | 2.34% |
Drawdowns
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than MUFG's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and MUFG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA.TO | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.47% | -76.75% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -18.87% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -32.81% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -57.62% | +9.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -13.99% | +8.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -43.84% | +33.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 6.74% | -3.83% |
Volatility
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) is 5.98%, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that NA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NA.TO | MUFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 8.71% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 18.54% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 30.58% | -12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 27.56% | -10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 27.01% | -6.04% |
Financials
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Bank of Canada and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NA.TO vs. MUFG - Profitability Comparison
NA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 3.65B and revenue of 7.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.
MUFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.34T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 1.64B and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
MUFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 650.09B and revenue of 3.34T, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
NA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 7.94B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
MUFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 529.95B and revenue of 3.34T, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.