MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).
MXWS.L and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXWS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both MXWS.L and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MXWS.L or SSAC.L.
Performance
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXWS.L achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than SSAC.L's 18.74% return.
MXWS.L
19.74%
2.52%
8.15%
24.80%
13.17%
N/A
SSAC.L
18.74%
2.08%
7.41%
23.34%
11.55%
11.31%
Key characteristics
| MXWS.L | SSAC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.45 | 2.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.45 | 3.28 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.03 | 3.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.92 | 16.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.38% | 1.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.06% | 9.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.29% | -25.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.64% | -0.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXWS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between MXWS.L and SSAC.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MXWS.L nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXWS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.29%, roughly equal to the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWS.L and SSAC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MXWS.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.