MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L).
MXUS.L and VWRL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXUS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. VWRL.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both MXUS.L and VWRL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MXUS.L or VWRL.L.
Key characteristics
| MXUS.L | VWRL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.15% | 11.24% |
| 1Y Return | 26.77% | 15.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.79% | 7.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.01% | 10.38% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.57% | 11.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.22 | 1.61 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.44% | 10.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.38% | -24.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.34% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXUS.L and VWRL.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MXUS.L achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.L's 11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MXUS.L has outperformed VWRL.L with an annualized return of 12.57%, while VWRL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison
MXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.20% | 1.73% | 2.04% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.23% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, which is greater than VWRL.L's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXUS.L and VWRL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MXUS.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that MXUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.