MXI vs. VDE
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for VDE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
MXI vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 23.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
MXI vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 23.55% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and VDE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MXI and VDE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MXI vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
VDE
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
MXI
VDE
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
MXI
VDE
-
Industrials
MXI
VDE
Communication Services
MXI
-
VDE
-
Energy
MXI
-
VDE
Financial Services
MXI
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
MXI
-
VDE
-
Real Estate
MXI
-
VDE
-
Technology
MXI
-
VDE
-
Utilities
MXI
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
VDE
MXI vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.19 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 6.75 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -74.20% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -14.20% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -21.41% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -26.58% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -69.29% | +29.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -12.59% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -19.94% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 4.61% | -0.42% |
Volatility
MXI vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 7.06%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 7.06% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 16.61% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 20.80% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 26.37% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 29.94% | -9.52% |
MXI vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than VDE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and VDE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to VDE (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 11.38% vs 8.90% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.72% for MXI.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while VDE is Energy Equities. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer