PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWTIX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWTIX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MWTIX has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.16% annualized return.


MWTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
4.22%

FTBFX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
-0.71%7.51%0.77%6.02%-15.49%-1.32%9.00%9.10%0.36%3.43%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
-0.46%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MWTIX and FTBFX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

0.90

The correlation between MWTIX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWTIX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MWTIX
MWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWTIXFTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.11

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

2.83

-0.53

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWTIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWTIX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWTIX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWTIX and FTBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWTIXFTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.58%

-18.25%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-2.89%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-4.96%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-18.25%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.58%

-18.25%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-2.31%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-2.31%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.13%

+0.23%

Volatility

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.04% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWTIXFTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.04%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

3.00%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

3.76%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

5.68%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

4.74%

+0.60%

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MWTIX and FTBFX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

MWTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than FTBFX's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.03%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
3.75%3.89%4.38%4.11%2.08%1.12%6.48%3.61%2.91%2.14%3.35%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MWTIX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTBFX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to MWTIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWTIX dropped -20.58% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWTIX and FTBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer