MWTIX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MWTIX (Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 10 years, MWTIX returned 1.63%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FTBFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWTIX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MWTIX has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 1.63%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.

MWTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: 1.63%

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MWTIX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I	0.24%	7.51%	0.77%	6.02%	-15.49%	-1.32%	9.00%	9.10%	0.36%	3.43%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MWTIX and FTBFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2002	0.90

The correlation between MWTIX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MWTIX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWTIX

MWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 20
MWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MWTIX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.49	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.24	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.99	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.11	6.10	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWTIX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWTIX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.49	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.13	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.52	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.93	0.00

Drawdowns

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWTIX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWTIX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWTIX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.58%	-18.25%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.34%	-2.89%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.09%	-5.82%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.51%	-18.25%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.58%	-18.25%	-2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-1.31%	-2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-2.32%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.94%	+0.16%

Volatility

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.40%. This indicates that MWTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MWTIX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.40%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	2.80%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40%	3.88%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.64%	5.67%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.33%	4.73%	+0.60%

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MWTIX and FTBFX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

MWTIX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

MWTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%
MWTIX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I	4.06%	3.89%	4.38%	4.11%	2.08%	1.12%	6.48%	3.61%	2.91%	2.14%	3.35%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MWTIX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, MWTIX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MWTIX or FTBFX?

MWTIX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to FTBFX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWTIX dropped -20.58% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.