MWOFX vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
MWOFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Nov 17, 1993. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MWOFX or SMH.
Performance
MWOFX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOFX achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 39.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MWOFX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 7.04%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.03% annualized return.
MWOFX
12.92%
-0.54%
4.39%
15.69%
6.83%
7.04%
SMH
39.89%
-1.76%
0.15%
51.80%
33.24%
28.03%
Key characteristics
MWOFX | SMH | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.37 | 1.50 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 2.01 |
Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.26 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.04 | 2.09 |
Martin Ratio | 7.90 | 5.56 |
Ulcer Index | 1.98% | 9.31% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.47% | 34.44% |
Max Drawdown | -53.92% | -95.73% |
Current Drawdown | -1.94% | -13.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWOFX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MWOFX and SMH is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MWOFX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MWOFX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SMH's 0.43% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFS Global Growth Fund | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.07% | 0.31% | 4.66% | 3.64% |
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.43% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
MWOFX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MWOFX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) is 3.26%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that MWOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.