PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWCIX vs. PLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund (MWCIX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWCIX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than PLFRX's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MWCIX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 2.85%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.08% annualized return.


MWCIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
2.85%

PLFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
5.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MWCIX
Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund
1.22%7.50%5.40%6.07%-9.39%0.65%4.54%6.49%1.11%3.98%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
0.99%6.68%8.38%13.94%-2.01%4.36%1.26%8.30%0.39%4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MWCIX and PLFRX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWCIX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWCIX
MWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PLFRX
PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund (MWCIX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MWCIXPLFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.80

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.37

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

11.48

+3.63

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PLFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWCIX and PLFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWCIX drawdown since its inception was -13.00%, smaller than the maximum PLFRX drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWCIX and PLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWCIXPLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.00%

-18.75%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-1.73%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.33%

-2.17%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-6.44%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.00%

-18.75%

+5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.32%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-0.73%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.51%

-0.12%

Volatility

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund (MWCIX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.64%. This indicates that MWCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWCIXPLFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.64%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

1.89%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

2.48%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

2.79%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

3.77%

-0.61%

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWCIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWCIX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison

MWCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than PLFRX's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MWCIX
Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund
5.43%5.26%5.93%4.87%3.50%3.39%3.46%3.89%3.77%2.81%3.22%2.15%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
7.10%7.18%8.47%8.92%4.39%3.65%3.68%5.10%5.03%4.46%4.21%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWCIX and PLFRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWCIX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to PLFRX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWCIX dropped -13.00% vs PLFRX's -18.75%.

PLFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWCIX and PLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer