PortfoliosLab logo
MVPS vs. GINN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVPS and GINN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MVPS vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.81%
2.55%
MVPS
GINN

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MVPS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GINN

YTD

-1.07%

1M

18.17%

6M

-2.82%

1Y

11.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVPS vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVPS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVPS vs. GINN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVPS is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVPS is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVPS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GINN is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GINN is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GINN is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GINN is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GINN is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GINN is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVPS vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.70
0.54
MVPS
GINN

Dividends

MVPS vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

MVPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


TTM20242023202220212020
MVPS
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.27%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%

Drawdowns

MVPS vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.78%
-8.13%
MVPS
GINN

Volatility

MVPS vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF (MVPS) is 0.00%, while Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that MVPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
11.22%
MVPS
GINN