PortfoliosLab logo
MVO vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVO and QYLD is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

MVO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MV Oil Trust (MVO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MVO:

43.77%

QYLD:

0.79%

Max Drawdown

MVO:

-89.58%

QYLD:

0.00%

Current Drawdown

MVO:

-51.09%

QYLD:

0.00%

Returns By Period


MVO

YTD

-22.75%

1M

-3.47%

6M

-29.67%

1Y

-30.00%

5Y*

29.52%

10Y*

5.87%

QYLD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVO vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVO is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVO is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVO is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVO is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVO is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVO is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MV Oil Trust (MVO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MVO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

MVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.79%, more than QYLD's 4.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVO
MV Oil Trust
21.79%19.12%12.15%13.59%11.16%15.71%16.75%20.29%8.57%6.42%26.18%23.30%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MVO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVO drawdown since its inception was -89.58%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVO and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MVO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...