MVO vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about MV Oil Trust (MVO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MVO or QYLD.
Key characteristics
| MVO | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -15.02% | 18.06% |
| 1Y Return | -15.58% | 22.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.51% | 5.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 23.86% | 7.67% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.02% | 8.44% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.51 | 2.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.55 | 3.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.93 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.42 | 2.93 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.03 | 16.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 15.06% | 1.41% |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.04% | 10.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.58% | -24.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.46% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVO and QYLD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MVO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MVO achieves a -15.02% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MVO has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 3.02%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MVO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MV Oil Trust (MVO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MVO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
MVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.40%, more than QYLD's 11.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVO MV Oil Trust | 17.40% | 12.15% | 13.59% | 11.16% | 15.71% | 16.75% | 20.29% | 8.57% | 6.42% | 26.18% | 23.30% | 13.55% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.25% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MVO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVO drawdown since its inception was -89.58%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVO and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MVO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
MV Oil Trust (MVO) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.54%. This indicates that MVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.