PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MUST vs. SCMBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MUSTSCMBX
YTD Return0.99%2.81%
1Y Return7.43%9.94%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.48%-0.51%
5Y Return (Ann)1.46%1.39%
Sharpe Ratio1.462.53
Sortino Ratio2.143.90
Omega Ratio1.271.61
Calmar Ratio0.780.89
Martin Ratio7.5811.62
Ulcer Index0.98%0.85%
Daily Std Dev5.08%3.92%
Max Drawdown-13.83%-17.56%
Current Drawdown-2.82%-2.28%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MUST and SCMBX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MUST vs. SCMBX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCMBX's 2.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.54%
2.54%
MUST
SCMBX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUST vs. SCMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SCMBX's 0.54% expense ratio.


SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for SCMBX: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%
Expense ratio chart for MUST: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUST vs. SCMBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MUST, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MUST, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MUST, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MUST, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MUST, currently valued at 7.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.58
SCMBX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCMBX, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCMBX, currently valued at 3.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCMBX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCMBX, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCMBX, currently valued at 11.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.62

MUST vs. SCMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUST Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the SCMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUST and SCMBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.46
2.53
MUST
SCMBX

Dividends

MUST vs. SCMBX - Dividend Comparison

MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than SCMBX's 4.04% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
3.03%2.51%1.76%1.61%2.34%2.69%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCMBX
DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund
4.04%4.08%4.30%2.87%4.00%3.49%3.38%3.42%3.78%3.91%4.07%4.30%

Drawdowns

MUST vs. SCMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, smaller than the maximum SCMBX drawdown of -17.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and SCMBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.82%
-2.28%
MUST
SCMBX

Volatility

MUST vs. SCMBX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund (SCMBX) at 1.93%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.14%
1.93%
MUST
SCMBX