PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MUSA vs. ARES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MUSAARES
YTD Return50.72%28.19%
1Y Return61.15%46.03%
3Y Return (Ann)48.62%27.21%
5Y Return (Ann)44.62%42.02%
10Y Return (Ann)26.01%29.58%
Sharpe Ratio2.561.67
Daily Std Dev23.33%27.67%
Max Drawdown-33.72%-45.85%
Current Drawdown0.00%-1.87%

Fundamentals


MUSAARES
Market Cap$10.93B$45.02B
EPS$24.69$1.94
PE Ratio21.6074.14
PEG Ratio2.370.63
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.16B$3.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.79B$3.04B
EBITDA (TTM)$928.50M$917.62M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between MUSA and ARES is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MUSA vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 50.72% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's 28.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 26.01%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 29.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
29.91%
16.30%
MUSA
ARES

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUSA vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 3.71, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 7.38, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.007.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MUSA, currently valued at 20.03, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0020.03
ARES
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARES, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARES, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARES, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARES, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARES, currently valued at 9.45, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.009.45

MUSA vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MUSA and ARES.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.56
1.67
MUSA
ARES

Dividends

MUSA vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ARES's 2.38% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.32%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
2.38%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum ARES drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and ARES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-1.87%
MUSA
ARES

Volatility

MUSA vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is 5.58%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that MUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.58%
6.72%
MUSA
ARES

Financials

MUSA vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy USA Inc. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items