MUNI vs. SCHV
MUNI (PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUNI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. MUNI is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MUNI returned 2.17%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for SCHV. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. MUNI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
MUNI vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNI has underperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 2.17%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.
MUNI
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
MUNI vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.28% | 4.72% | 1.43% | 6.07% | -6.62% | 0.67% | 4.83% | 7.09% | 0.84% | 4.86% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNI and SCHV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009 | -0.08 |
The correlation between MUNI and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNI vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
MUNI
SCHV
MUNI vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUNI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.90 | 2.69 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | 3.84 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.48 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.19 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 16.96 | -7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUNI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 2.69 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.72 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.72 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
MUNI vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -37.08% | +25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -6.83% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.09% | -15.26% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.15% | -19.78% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.15% | -37.08% | +25.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -3.83% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.69% | -1.00% |
Volatility
MUNI vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.78%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNI | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 3.09% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.61% | 8.13% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 10.63% | -8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 14.51% | -11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 16.94% | -13.09% |
MUNI vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUNI vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 3.28% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 3.09% | 2.13% | 1.62% | 1.92% | 2.44% | 2.38% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.20% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNI and SCHV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to MUNI (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.50% vs 2.17% for MUNI. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MUNI has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MUNI.
MUNI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.
MUNI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MUNI and 0.04% for SCHV.
MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUNI and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer