PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNI vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNI vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNI has underperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 2.17%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


MUNI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
2.17%

SCHV

1D
0.09%
1M
5.65%
YTD
15.39%
6M
16.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNI vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
1.28%4.72%1.43%6.07%-6.62%0.67%4.83%7.09%0.84%4.86%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.39%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNI and SCHV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009

-0.08

The correlation between MUNI and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNI vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNI vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUNISCHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

2.69

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

3.84

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.48

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

4.19

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.33

16.96

-7.63

MUNI vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNI Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNI and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNISCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.69

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.72

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.68

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.72

+0.06

Drawdowns

MUNI vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNISCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-37.08%

+25.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-6.83%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.09%

-15.26%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-19.78%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

-37.08%

+25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-3.83%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.69%

-1.00%

Volatility

MUNI vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.78%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNISCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

3.09%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

8.13%

-6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

10.63%

-8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

14.51%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

16.94%

-13.09%

MUNI vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNI vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than SCHV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.28%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNI and SCHV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to MUNI (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.50% vs 2.17% for MUNI. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MUNI has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MUNI.

MUNI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.

MUNI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MUNI and 0.04% for SCHV.

MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNI and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer