Correlation
The correlation between MUNI and SCHP is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
MUNI vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
MUNI and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MUNI is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MUNI or SCHP.
Performance
MUNI vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MUNI:
0.50
SCHP:
1.25
MUNI:
0.64
SCHP:
1.77
MUNI:
1.10
SCHP:
1.23
MUNI:
0.56
SCHP:
0.63
MUNI:
1.59
SCHP:
3.84
MUNI:
1.28%
SCHP:
1.60%
MUNI:
4.42%
SCHP:
4.80%
MUNI:
-11.15%
SCHP:
-14.26%
MUNI:
-2.18%
SCHP:
-4.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNI has underperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 2.16%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.53% annualized return.
MUNI
-0.40%
-0.35%
-1.52%
2.22%
2.52%
0.99%
2.16%
SCHP
3.55%
-0.74%
1.97%
5.96%
0.90%
1.56%
2.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUNI vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MUNI vs. SCHP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MUNI
SCHP
MUNI vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MUNI vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than SCHP's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 3.45% | 3.50% | 3.63% | 2.13% | 1.62% | 1.92% | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.20% | 1.91% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.27% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
MUNI vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and SCHP.
Loading data...
Volatility
MUNI vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.82%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...