MULN vs. RIVN

In the year-to-date period, MULN achieves a -100.00% return, which is significantly lower than RIVN's 11.80% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mullen Automotive, Inc. (MULN) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MULN Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the RIVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MULN and RIVN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither MULN nor RIVN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MULN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than RIVN's maximum drawdown of -95.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULN and RIVN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Mullen Automotive, Inc. (MULN) has a higher volatility of 39.68% compared to Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) at 14.87%. This indicates that MULN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mullen Automotive, Inc. and Rivian Automotive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.