MULN vs. NOBL

In the year-to-date period, MULN achieves a -100.00% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MULN has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -79.25%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mullen Automotive, Inc. (MULN) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MULN Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MULN and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MULN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

The maximum MULN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULN and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Mullen Automotive, Inc. (MULN) has a higher volatility of 36.03% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 5.20%. This indicates that MULN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.