MU vs. T

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and AT&T Inc. (T).

Performance

MU vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MU vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	28.94%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%
T AT&T Inc.	15.30%	13.97%	44.08%	-2.74%	5.76%	-8.09%	-21.37%	45.55%	-22.25%	-4.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MU : $419.35B T : $203.24B
EPS MU : $21.30 T : $3.04
PE Ratio MU : 17.27 T : 9.30
PEG Ratio MU : 0.06 T : 0.39
PS Ratio MU : 7.16 T : 1.62
PB Ratio MU : 5.79 T : 1.63
Total Revenue (TTM) MU : $58.12B T : $125.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) MU : $33.96B T : $100.22B
EBITDA (TTM) MU : $25.99B T : $53.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than T's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed T with an annualized return of 42.36%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.

MU

• 1D: 8.88%
• 1M: -10.82%
• YTD: 28.94%
• 6M: 102.24%
• 1Y: 315.66%
• 3Y*: 83.59%
• 5Y*: 32.48%
• 10Y*: 42.36%

T

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 6M: 5.08%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 20.19%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 5.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MU vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

T

T Risk / Return Rank: 43
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
T Omega Ratio Rank: 37
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
T Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MU	T	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.86	0.17	+4.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	0.38	+3.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.05	+0.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.71	0.22	+10.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	36.18	0.49	+35.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MU vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 4.86, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and T, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MU	T	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.86	0.17	+4.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.45	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	0.24	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.40	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between MU and T is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MU vs. T - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than T's 3.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.13%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
T AT&T Inc.	3.92%	4.47%	4.87%	6.62%	6.66%	8.46%	7.23%	5.22%	7.01%	5.04%	4.51%	5.46%

Drawdowns

MU vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and T.

Drawdown Indicators

	MU	T	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.25%	-64.15%	-34.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.28%	-20.60%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.63%	-36.68%	-20.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.63%	-42.35%	-15.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.30%	-2.71%	-17.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.45%	-15.74%	-42.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.97%	9.06%	-0.09%

Volatility

MU vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 23.60% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 6.76%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MU	T	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.60%	6.76%	+16.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.79%	16.58%	+33.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.48%	22.51%	+42.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.97%	23.85%	+26.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.66%	23.49%	+25.17%

Financials