PortfoliosLab logo
MTW vs. CMCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MTW and CMCO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MTW vs. CMCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTW:

-0.30

CMCO:

-1.05

Sortino Ratio

MTW:

0.07

CMCO:

-1.58

Omega Ratio

MTW:

1.01

CMCO:

0.73

Calmar Ratio

MTW:

-0.14

CMCO:

-0.86

Martin Ratio

MTW:

-0.49

CMCO:

-1.92

Ulcer Index

MTW:

24.56%

CMCO:

34.27%

Daily Std Dev

MTW:

55.69%

CMCO:

61.74%

Max Drawdown

MTW:

-95.19%

CMCO:

-95.20%

Current Drawdown

MTW:

-76.30%

CMCO:

-74.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTW:

$372.51M

CMCO:

$395.12M

EPS

MTW:

$1.26

CMCO:

-$0.18

PEG Ratio

MTW:

1.64

CMCO:

0.46

PS Ratio

MTW:

0.17

CMCO:

0.41

PB Ratio

MTW:

0.56

CMCO:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTW:

$2.15B

CMCO:

$716.14M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTW:

$371.90M

CMCO:

$238.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTW:

$95.10M

CMCO:

$64.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTW achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than CMCO's -62.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MTW has underperformed CMCO with an annualized return of -5.51%, while CMCO has yielded a comparatively higher -4.75% annualized return.


MTW

YTD

13.47%

1M

21.88%

6M

-2.08%

1Y

-16.65%

3Y*

-8.20%

5Y*

0.23%

10Y*

-5.51%

CMCO

YTD

-62.69%

1M

-12.44%

6M

-64.47%

1Y

-64.33%

3Y*

-25.93%

5Y*

-15.18%

10Y*

-4.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Columbus McKinnon Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTW vs. CMCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTW is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTW is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTW is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTW is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTW is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTW is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMCO is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMCO is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMCO is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMCO is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMCO is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMCO is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTW vs. CMCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the CMCO Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTW and CMCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MTW vs. CMCO - Dividend Comparison

MTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTW
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.52%0.36%
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
2.03%0.75%0.72%0.83%0.52%0.62%0.57%0.63%0.40%0.59%0.85%0.43%

Drawdowns

MTW vs. CMCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTW drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum CMCO drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTW and CMCO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MTW vs. CMCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) is 20.40%, while Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a volatility of 23.00%. This indicates that MTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MTW vs. CMCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
470.90M
234.14M
(MTW) Total Revenue
(CMCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items