PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTW vs. CMCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MTW vs. CMCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTW vs. CMCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTW
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
0.50%31.33%-45.30%82.21%-50.73%39.67%-23.94%18.48%-62.46%64.46%
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
-16.65%-52.93%-3.85%21.12%-29.26%20.95%-3.27%33.65%-24.23%48.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTW:

$440.04M

CMCO:

$414.72M

EPS

MTW:

$0.20

CMCO:

$0.21

PE Ratio

MTW:

60.41

CMCO:

68.69

PEG Ratio

MTW:

1.89

CMCO:

1.84

PS Ratio

MTW:

0.19

CMCO:

0.41

PB Ratio

MTW:

0.63

CMCO:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTW:

$2.24B

CMCO:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTW:

$404.00M

CMCO:

$336.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTW:

$95.00M

CMCO:

$76.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTW achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than CMCO's -16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MTW has underperformed CMCO with an annualized return of -3.63%, while CMCO has yielded a comparatively higher -0.19% annualized return.


MTW

1D
3.43%
1M
-18.80%
YTD
0.50%
6M
18.72%
1Y
38.35%
3Y*
-10.99%
5Y*
-10.18%
10Y*
-3.63%

CMCO

1D
-1.38%
1M
-24.97%
YTD
-16.65%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-12.68%
3Y*
-26.41%
5Y*
-22.50%
10Y*
-0.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Columbus McKinnon Corporation

Often compared with MTW:
MTW vs. GENCMTW vs. RAIL

Return for Risk

MTW vs. CMCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTW
MTW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCO
CMCO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTW vs. CMCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) and Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTWCMCODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

-0.22

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

0.08

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

-0.35

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.68

-0.80

+3.49

MTW vs. CMCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTW Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the CMCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTW and CMCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTWCMCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

-0.22

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

-0.51

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

-0.00

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.01

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MTW and CMCO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MTW vs. CMCO - Dividend Comparison

MTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTW
The Manitowoc Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.52%
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
1.95%1.62%0.75%0.72%0.83%0.52%0.62%0.57%0.63%0.40%0.59%0.85%

Drawdowns

MTW vs. CMCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTW drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum CMCO drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTW and CMCO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTWCMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-95.20%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.74%

-40.11%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.44%

-76.37%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.39%

-76.37%

-7.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.76%

-72.83%

-20.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.70%

-38.34%

-10.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.01%

17.25%

-2.24%

Volatility

MTW vs. CMCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) is 12.94%, while Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that MTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTWCMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.94%

15.12%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.23%

37.07%

-5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.80%

58.11%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.74%

44.16%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.26%

43.54%

+8.72%

Financials

MTW vs. CMCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
677.10M
258.66M
(MTW) Total Revenue
(CMCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTW vs. CMCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Manitowoc Company, Inc. and Columbus McKinnon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
16.7%
34.5%
Portfolio components
MTW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.30M and revenue of 677.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

CMCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a gross profit of 89.16M and revenue of 258.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

MTW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.20M and revenue of 677.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

CMCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported an operating income of 16.17M and revenue of 258.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MTW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. reported a net income of 7.00M and revenue of 677.10M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

CMCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Columbus McKinnon Corporation reported a net income of 6.00M and revenue of 258.66M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.