MTUM vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while LIT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.19%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for LIT. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

MTUM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 30.30% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 28.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 17.19%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.38% annualized return.

MTUM

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 30.30%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 40.55%
• 3Y*: 34.34%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

LIT

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -5.85%
• YTD: 28.40%
• 6M: 34.19%
• 1Y: 125.46%
• 3Y*: 10.73%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	30.30%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	28.40%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and LIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013	0.52

The correlation between MTUM and LIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MTUM	LIT
Technology	44.4%	11.5%
Industrials	15.6%	26.0%
Financial Services	10.4%	-
Communication Services	7.4%	-
Healthcare	6.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	7.0%
Energy	3.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	55.4%
Utilities	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 68
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 93
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTUM	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	3.86	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	4.23	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.56	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	9.62	-6.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.10	32.28	-18.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTUM vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTUM	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	3.86	-1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.14	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.47	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.26	+0.58

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUM	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-65.91%	+31.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-13.11%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.99%	-53.01%	+32.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.28%	-65.91%	+33.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-65.91%	+31.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-10.23%	+9.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-33.63%	+27.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.90%	-1.01%

Volatility

MTUM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is 7.67%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that MTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUM	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.67%	8.66%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	22.09%	-5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.08%	32.75%	-13.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	31.81%	-11.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	30.66%	-9.63%

MTUM vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTUM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than LIT's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.38%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTUM and LIT in my portfolio?

MTUM and LIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTUM or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to MTUM (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which ETF is better, MTUM or LIT?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 14.38% for LIT. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTUM or LIT?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 14.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTUM or LIT?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTUM or LIT?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.38% for LIT.

What is the main difference between MTUM and LIT?

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.75% for LIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.