PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTUM vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and LIT is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

MTUM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.32%
6.00%
MTUM
LIT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTUM:

1.98

LIT:

-0.14

Sortino Ratio

MTUM:

2.67

LIT:

0.03

Omega Ratio

MTUM:

1.34

LIT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

MTUM:

2.73

LIT:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

MTUM:

11.37

LIT:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

MTUM:

3.32%

LIT:

12.47%

Daily Std Dev

MTUM:

19.07%

LIT:

32.60%

Max Drawdown

MTUM:

-34.08%

LIT:

-62.61%

Current Drawdown

MTUM:

0.00%

LIT:

-54.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 13.64%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


MTUM

YTD

5.04%

1M

5.84%

6M

14.32%

1Y

35.93%

5Y*

11.90%

10Y*

13.64%

LIT

YTD

3.68%

1M

1.05%

6M

6.00%

1Y

-5.29%

5Y*

7.92%

10Y*

8.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTUM vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for MTUM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTUM vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTUM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTUM is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTUM is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTUM is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTUM is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTUM is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTUM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTUM, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.98-0.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTUM, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.670.03
The chart of Omega ratio for MTUM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.341.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTUM, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.73-0.07
The chart of Martin ratio for MTUM, currently valued at 11.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.37-0.36
MTUM
LIT

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.98
-0.14
MTUM
LIT

Dividends

MTUM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than LIT's 0.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTUM
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%1.04%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.90%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-54.71%
MTUM
LIT

Volatility

MTUM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is 6.17%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that MTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.17%
6.66%
MTUM
LIT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab