PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTR vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MTR and QQQ is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

MTR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-12.04%
16.74%
MTR
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTR:

-0.76

QQQ:

1.28

Sortino Ratio

MTR:

-1.07

QQQ:

1.76

Omega Ratio

MTR:

0.89

QQQ:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

MTR:

-0.45

QQQ:

1.74

Martin Ratio

MTR:

-1.04

QQQ:

6.02

Ulcer Index

MTR:

34.07%

QQQ:

3.91%

Daily Std Dev

MTR:

46.97%

QQQ:

18.32%

Max Drawdown

MTR:

-88.92%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

MTR:

-74.94%

QQQ:

-2.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTR achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MTR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -4.97%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.


MTR

YTD

16.76%

1M

16.76%

6M

-12.04%

1Y

-34.67%

5Y*

5.31%

10Y*

-4.97%

QQQ

YTD

2.16%

1M

2.16%

6M

16.74%

1Y

24.54%

5Y*

19.79%

10Y*

18.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTR vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTR is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTR is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTR is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTR is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTR is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTR is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTR, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.761.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTR, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.071.76
The chart of Omega ratio for MTR, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.891.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTR, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.451.74
The chart of Martin ratio for MTR, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.046.02
MTR
QQQ

The current MTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTR and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.76
1.28
MTR
QQQ

Dividends

MTR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than QQQ's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
2.70%3.57%11.28%8.95%6.87%7.15%13.10%10.98%8.20%5.94%13.75%13.66%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.54%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

MTR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTR drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTR and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-74.94%
-2.79%
MTR
QQQ

Volatility

MTR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.83%. This indicates that MTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.28%
5.83%
MTR
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab