MTR vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MTR or CRT.
Correlation
The correlation between MTR and CRT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MTR vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MTR:
-1.04
CRT:
-1.05
MTR:
-1.78
CRT:
-1.59
MTR:
0.81
CRT:
0.81
MTR:
-0.62
CRT:
-0.63
MTR:
-1.23
CRT:
-1.29
MTR:
40.41%
CRT:
32.65%
MTR:
47.64%
CRT:
40.19%
MTR:
-88.92%
CRT:
-83.46%
MTR:
-78.11%
CRT:
-62.17%
Fundamentals
MTR:
$11.85M
CRT:
$58.62M
MTR:
$0.35
CRT:
$1.13
MTR:
18.17
CRT:
8.65
MTR:
0.00
CRT:
0.00
MTR:
$899.20K
CRT:
$10.57M
MTR:
$504.71K
CRT:
$13.67M
MTR:
$323.41K
CRT:
$4.40M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTR achieves a -53.20% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's -40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MTR has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of -6.85%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.
MTR
-53.20%
-16.63%
-27.65%
-49.62%
4.35%
-6.85%
CRT
-40.15%
-9.82%
-5.76%
-42.19%
15.69%
2.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MTR vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MTR vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
MTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than CRT's 10.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTR Mesa Royalty Trust | 3.63% | 11.28% | 8.95% | 6.87% | 7.15% | 13.10% | 10.98% | 8.20% | 5.94% | 13.75% | 13.66% | 8.74% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.47% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
MTR vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTR drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTR and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MTR vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a higher volatility of 12.63% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 7.95%. This indicates that MTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MTR vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mesa Royalty Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities