MTL.L vs. GOOD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Metals Exploration plc (MTL.L) and Good Energy Group plc (GOOD.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MTL.L or GOOD.L.
Correlation
The correlation between MTL.L and GOOD.L is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MTL.L:
1.88
GOOD.L:
1.79
MTL.L:
2.51
GOOD.L:
2.53
MTL.L:
1.31
GOOD.L:
1.39
MTL.L:
3.45
GOOD.L:
2.41
MTL.L:
8.13
GOOD.L:
5.76
MTL.L:
15.04%
GOOD.L:
17.39%
MTL.L:
64.84%
GOOD.L:
55.96%
MTL.L:
-73.39%
GOOD.L:
-67.88%
MTL.L:
-6.25%
GOOD.L:
-0.42%
Fundamentals
MTL.L:
£155.61M
GOOD.L:
£88.46M
MTL.L:
£0.05
GOOD.L:
-£0.39
MTL.L:
0.00
GOOD.L:
0.00
MTL.L:
£91.15M
GOOD.L:
£97.40M
MTL.L:
£17.74M
GOOD.L:
£23.64M
MTL.L:
£96.72M
GOOD.L:
£4.87M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTL.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD.L's 29.72% return.
MTL.L
12.15%
0.84%
36.36%
130.77%
N/A
N/A
GOOD.L
29.72%
31.32%
92.81%
100.16%
21.08%
10.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MTL.L
GOOD.L
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metals Exploration plc (MTL.L) and Good Energy Group plc (GOOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Dividend Comparison
MTL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.08%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTL.L Metals Exploration plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOD.L Good Energy Group plc | 70.08% | 90.91% | 81.74% | 141.67% | 30.93% | 0.00% | 170.62% | 352.94% | 180.82% | 120.44% | 162.10% | 156.40% |
Drawdowns
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTL.L drawdown since its inception was -73.39%, which is greater than GOOD.L's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTL.L and GOOD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Metals Exploration plc (MTL.L) is 19.13%, while Good Energy Group plc (GOOD.L) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that MTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MTL.L vs. GOOD.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metals Exploration plc and Good Energy Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities