PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTH vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MTH and IWM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MTH vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-21.78%
5.68%
MTH
IWM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTH:

0.06

IWM:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

MTH:

0.35

IWM:

1.04

Omega Ratio

MTH:

1.04

IWM:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

MTH:

0.07

IWM:

0.71

Martin Ratio

MTH:

0.15

IWM:

2.78

Ulcer Index

MTH:

14.07%

IWM:

4.51%

Daily Std Dev

MTH:

35.97%

IWM:

19.63%

Max Drawdown

MTH:

-93.22%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

MTH:

-29.93%

IWM:

-7.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTH achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MTH has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 14.07%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.67% annualized return.


MTH

YTD

-3.54%

1M

-7.92%

6M

-21.78%

1Y

0.55%

5Y*

16.52%

10Y*

14.07%

IWM

YTD

1.49%

1M

-2.41%

6M

5.68%

1Y

14.63%

5Y*

7.46%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTH vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTH is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTH is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTH is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTH is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTH is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTH is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTH vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTH, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.060.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTH, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.351.04
The chart of Omega ratio for MTH, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.041.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTH, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.070.71
The chart of Martin ratio for MTH, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.152.78
MTH
IWM

The current MTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTH and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.06
0.64
MTH
IWM

Dividends

MTH vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

MTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than IWM's 1.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTH
Meritage Homes Corporation
2.02%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.13%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

MTH vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTH drawdown since its inception was -93.22%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTH and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-29.93%
-7.21%
MTH
IWM

Volatility

MTH vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 3.72%. This indicates that MTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.04%
3.72%
MTH
IWM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab