PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTA vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MTA and GLD is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

MTA vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
69.10%
149.49%
MTA
GLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTA:

-0.01

GLD:

2.39

Sortino Ratio

MTA:

0.39

GLD:

3.16

Omega Ratio

MTA:

1.04

GLD:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

MTA:

-0.01

GLD:

4.82

Martin Ratio

MTA:

-0.03

GLD:

12.91

Ulcer Index

MTA:

20.33%

GLD:

3.03%

Daily Std Dev

MTA:

53.35%

GLD:

16.36%

Max Drawdown

MTA:

-81.73%

GLD:

-45.56%

Current Drawdown

MTA:

-75.77%

GLD:

0.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MTA having a 26.29% return and GLD slightly higher at 26.99%.


MTA

YTD

26.29%

1M

3.59%

6M

-11.45%

1Y

-1.25%

5Y*

-10.41%

10Y*

N/A

GLD

YTD

26.99%

1M

11.11%

6M

24.41%

1Y

38.99%

5Y*

14.21%

10Y*

10.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTA vs. GLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTA is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTA is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTA is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTA is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTA is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTA is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTA vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
MTA: -0.01
GLD: 2.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTA, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
MTA: 0.39
GLD: 3.16
The chart of Omega ratio for MTA, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MTA: 1.04
GLD: 1.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
MTA: -0.01
GLD: 4.82
The chart of Martin ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
MTA: -0.03
GLD: 12.91

The current MTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTA and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.01
2.39
MTA
GLD

Dividends

MTA vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTA nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.79%2.13%
GLD
SPDR Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MTA vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-75.77%
0
MTA
GLD

Volatility

MTA vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 17.75% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 6.94%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.75%
6.94%
MTA
GLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab