PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTA vs. FNV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MTAFNV
YTD Return12.99%11.51%
1Y Return23.40%3.24%
3Y Return (Ann)-23.30%-4.67%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.16%6.10%
Sharpe Ratio0.440.11
Sortino Ratio1.090.34
Omega Ratio1.121.04
Calmar Ratio0.300.08
Martin Ratio1.610.44
Ulcer Index15.39%6.80%
Daily Std Dev55.81%27.09%
Max Drawdown-81.73%-58.76%
Current Drawdown-73.40%-25.15%

Fundamentals


MTAFNV
Market Cap$319.29M$23.65B
EPS-$0.10-$3.16
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.43M$827.09M
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.45M$536.57M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MTA and FNV is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MTA vs. FNV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTA achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than FNV's 11.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.39%
-3.62%
MTA
FNV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTA vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTA, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTA, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTA, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTA, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTA, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.61
FNV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNV, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNV, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.44

MTA vs. FNV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the FNV Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTA and FNV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.44
0.11
MTA
FNV

Dividends

MTA vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison

MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
0.00%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.79%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
1.16%1.23%0.94%0.84%0.82%0.72%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%1.59%1.77%

Drawdowns

MTA vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and FNV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-73.40%
-25.15%
MTA
FNV

Volatility

MTA vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) at 8.33%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.47%
8.33%
MTA
FNV

Financials

MTA vs. FNV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items