MTA vs. FNV
MTA (Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.) and FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — MTA in Other Precious Metals & Mining, FNV in Gold. Over the past 5 years, MTA returned -5.04%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for FNV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MTA vs. FNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTA achieves a -10.03% return, which is significantly lower than FNV's 3.59% return.
MTA
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- -10.03%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- 92.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FNV
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
MTA vs. FNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | -10.03% | 209.96% | -18.51% | -36.95% | -29.15% | -44.82% | 133.14% | 122.65% | 20.19% | 8.30% |
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 3.59% | 77.81% | 7.41% | -17.96% | -0.39% | 11.57% | 22.31% | 48.92% | -11.00% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTA and FNV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MTA and FNV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MTA:
$669.70M
FNV:
$41.33B
MTA:
-$0.04
FNV:
$7.10
MTA:
44.71
FNV:
19.63
MTA:
2.64
FNV:
5.08
MTA:
$14.70M
FNV:
$2.10B
MTA:
$12.51M
FNV:
$1.61B
MTA:
$3.72M
FNV:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTA vs. FNV — Risk / Return Rank
MTA
FNV
MTA vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTA | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.13 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 2.72 | +4.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTA vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and FNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTA | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.73% | -58.76% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.04% | -25.68% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.85% | -29.64% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.31% | -37.12% | -36.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.50% | -23.54% | -22.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.39% | -13.98% | -27.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.98% | 10.67% | +2.31% |
Volatility
MTA vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 18.44% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) at 13.78%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTA | FNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.44% | 13.78% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.18% | 30.94% | +9.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.96% | 36.78% | +17.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.59% | 30.54% | +23.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.13% | 30.22% | +26.91% |
Dividends
MTA vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison
MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.77% | 0.73% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 1.35% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 1.81% |
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.75% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MTA vs. FNV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTA vs. FNV - Profitability Comparison
MTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.66M and revenue of 3.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
FNV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.42M and revenue of 641.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
MTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported an operating income of 367.83K and revenue of 3.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.
FNV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 503.23M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.
MTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported a net income of 109.46K and revenue of 3.02M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
FNV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 462.11M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTA and FNV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTA has higher volatility (18.44%) compared to FNV (13.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTA dropped -81.73% vs FNV's -58.76%.
MTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTA and FNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer