PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTA vs. FNV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MTA and FNV is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

MTA vs. FNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-11.69%
1.34%
MTA
FNV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTA:

-0.24

FNV:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

MTA:

0.01

FNV:

1.01

Omega Ratio

MTA:

1.00

FNV:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

MTA:

-0.15

FNV:

0.47

Martin Ratio

MTA:

-0.75

FNV:

2.59

Ulcer Index

MTA:

16.75%

FNV:

6.67%

Daily Std Dev

MTA:

52.56%

FNV:

27.06%

Max Drawdown

MTA:

-81.73%

FNV:

-58.76%

Current Drawdown

MTA:

-79.21%

FNV:

-22.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTA:

$290.74M

FNV:

$24.46B

EPS

MTA:

-$0.11

FNV:

-$3.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTA:

$3.75M

FNV:

$787.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTA:

$1.89M

FNV:

$581.96M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MTA having a 8.37% return and FNV slightly lower at 8.06%.


MTA

YTD

8.37%

1M

-1.81%

6M

-14.73%

1Y

-9.93%

5Y*

-14.78%

10Y*

N/A

FNV

YTD

8.06%

1M

6.55%

6M

0.25%

1Y

17.47%

5Y*

4.80%

10Y*

10.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTA vs. FNV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTA is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTA is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTA is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTA is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTA is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTA is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FNV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNV is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNV is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNV is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNV is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNV is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNV is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTA vs. FNV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.240.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTA, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.011.01
The chart of Omega ratio for MTA, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.001.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.150.47
The chart of Martin ratio for MTA, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.752.59
MTA
FNV

The current MTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the FNV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTA and FNV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.24
0.64
MTA
FNV

Dividends

MTA vs. FNV - Dividend Comparison

MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.79%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
1.13%1.22%1.23%0.94%0.84%0.82%0.72%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%1.59%

Drawdowns

MTA vs. FNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, which is greater than FNV's maximum drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and FNV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-79.21%
-22.09%
MTA
FNV

Volatility

MTA vs. FNV - Volatility Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) at 7.41%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.66%
7.41%
MTA
FNV

Financials

MTA vs. FNV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab