MTA vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MTA or CCJ.
Key characteristics
| MTA | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.60% | 22.92% |
| 1Y Return | 6.38% | 20.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -29.12% | 24.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.83% | 41.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.27 | 0.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.12 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.19 | 0.64 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.99 | 1.53 |
| Ulcer Index | 15.55% | 14.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 56.27% | 43.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.73% | -87.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.07% | -8.69% |
Fundamentals
| MTA | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $290.74M | $23.68B |
| EPS | -$0.11 | $0.20 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.43M | $2.08B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.45M | $422.03M |
Correlation
The correlation between MTA and CCJ is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MTA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MTA achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 22.92% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MTA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MTA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.79% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.17% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
MTA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MTA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 17.44% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 13.39%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MTA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities