PortfoliosLab logo
MTA vs. CCJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MTA and CCJ is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MTA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MTA:

0.08

CCJ:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

MTA:

0.58

CCJ:

0.28

Omega Ratio

MTA:

1.06

CCJ:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

MTA:

0.07

CCJ:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

MTA:

0.26

CCJ:

-0.09

Ulcer Index

MTA:

20.96%

CCJ:

19.95%

Daily Std Dev

MTA:

53.70%

CCJ:

47.78%

Max Drawdown

MTA:

-81.73%

CCJ:

-87.86%

Current Drawdown

MTA:

-76.61%

CCJ:

-17.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTA:

$283.03M

CCJ:

$22.18B

EPS

MTA:

-$0.06

CCJ:

$0.41

PS Ratio

MTA:

48.12

CCJ:

6.71

PB Ratio

MTA:

1.09

CCJ:

4.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTA:

$4.63M

CCJ:

$3.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTA:

$2.88M

CCJ:

$961.04M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTA achieves a 21.91% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -1.28% return.


MTA

YTD

21.91%

1M

1.32%

6M

-12.07%

1Y

2.34%

5Y*

-9.30%

10Y*

N/A

CCJ

YTD

-1.28%

1M

31.15%

6M

-3.26%

1Y

-0.16%

5Y*

37.18%

10Y*

12.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTA vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTA is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTA is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTA is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTA is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTA is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTA is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCJ is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MTA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTA and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MTA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.79%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.22%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%

Drawdowns

MTA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MTA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 11.75%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MTA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
2.13M
789.43M
(MTA) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTA vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
69.6%
34.2%
(MTA) Gross Margin
(CCJ) Gross Margin
MTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.48M and revenue of 2.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 270.14M and revenue of 789.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.

MTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported an operating income of -1.09M and revenue of 2.13M, resulting in an operating margin of -51.4%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 185.81M and revenue of 789.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

MTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. reported a net income of -1.08M and revenue of 2.13M, resulting in a net margin of -50.9%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 69.76M and revenue of 789.43M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.