PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTA vs. AUD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTA vs. AUD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MTA is traded in USD, while AUD=X is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the AUD=X values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTA achieves a -10.03% return, which is significantly lower than AUD=X's 0.10% return.


MTA

1D
-3.45%
1M
3.09%
YTD
-10.03%
6M
-15.66%
1Y
92.31%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
-5.04%
10Y*

AUD=X

1D
0.12%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.11%
1Y
0.10%
3Y*
0.04%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
0.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTA vs. AUD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
-10.03%209.96%-18.51%-36.95%-29.15%-44.82%133.14%122.65%20.19%8.30%
AUD=X
USD/AUD
0.10%-0.01%0.03%0.01%-0.08%-0.04%0.11%0.09%-0.05%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MTA and AUD=X is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

-0.00

The correlation between MTA and AUD=X shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTA vs. AUD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTA
MTA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AUD=X
AUD=X Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AUD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AUD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTA vs. AUD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTAAUD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.02

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.10

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

0.15

+6.99

MTA vs. AUD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the AUD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTA and AUD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTA vs. AUD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTA drawdown since its inception was -81.73%, which is greater than AUD=X's maximum drawdown of -3.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTA and AUD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTAAUD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.73%

-3.07%

-78.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.04%

-0.81%

-32.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.85%

-1.22%

-48.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.31%

-1.22%

-72.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.50%

-1.60%

-44.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-1.64%

-39.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.98%

0.11%

+12.87%

Volatility

MTA vs. AUD=X - Volatility Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a higher volatility of 18.44% compared to USD/AUD (AUD=X) at 0.25%. This indicates that MTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTAAUD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.44%

0.25%

+18.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.18%

0.73%

+39.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.96%

1.33%

+52.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.59%

1.05%

+52.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.13%

1.33%

+55.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTA and AUD=X have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTA has higher volatility (18.44%) compared to AUD=X (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTA dropped -81.73% vs AUD=X's -3.07%.

MTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTA and AUD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer