MSTU vs. FAS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSTU is actively managed, while FAS is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTU returned -95.37% vs -12.36% for FAS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.

Performance

MSTU vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly lower than FAS's -24.46% return.

MSTU

• 1D: -14.03%
• 1M: -55.66%
• YTD: -54.27%
• 6M: -71.83%
• 1Y: -95.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAS

• 1D: -3.47%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: -24.46%
• 6M: -18.86%
• 1Y: -12.36%
• 3Y*: 34.13%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 18.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-54.27%	-89.07%	197.84%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-24.46%	21.48%	18.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and FAS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024	0.26

MSTU vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSTU	FAS
Technology	100.0%	1.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSTU vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 6
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTU	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	-0.29	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.12	-0.13	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	0.98	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.30	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-0.71	-0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSTU vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTU and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTU	FAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	-0.29	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.19	-0.59

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than FAS's maximum drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTU	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-91.61%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.58%	-40.88%	-55.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.88%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.52%	-30.69%	-67.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.94%	-31.11%	-40.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.17%	17.51%	+57.66%

Volatility

MSTU vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 39.06% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 9.50%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTU	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.06%	9.50%	+29.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.87%	32.51%	+79.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.62%	42.76%	+95.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	169.06%	55.49%	+113.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	169.06%	61.29%	+107.77%

MSTU vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTU vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	11.04%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTU and FAS in my portfolio?

MSTU and FAS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTU or FAS?

MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to FAS (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -98.58% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, MSTU or FAS?

On 1-year performance, FAS leads with -12.36% vs -95.37% for MSTU. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTU or FAS?

Over the 1-year period, FAS has performed better with a -12.36% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTU or FAS?

FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTU or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

What is the main difference between MSTU and FAS?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 1.00% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.