MSTDX vs. FIKQX
MSTDX (MassMutual Short Duration Bond Fund) and FIKQX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - MSTDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by MassMutual, while FIKQX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, MSTDX returned 1.32%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FIKQX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FIKQX.
Performance
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTDX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than FIKQX's 0.38% return.
MSTDX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTDX MassMutual Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.73% | 6.18% | 6.38% | 5.88% | -11.19% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 4.49% | 0.31% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 0.38% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTDX and FIKQX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between MSTDX and FIKQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTDX vs. FIKQX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTDX
FIKQX
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Short Duration Bond Fund (MSTDX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTDX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.22 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 1.48 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.84 | 4.23 | +12.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTDX drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum FIKQX drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTDX and FIKQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTDX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -18.53% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.06% | -3.13% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -6.05% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.31% | -18.53% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -1.58% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -5.19% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.10% | -0.84% |
Volatility
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MassMutual Short Duration Bond Fund (MSTDX) is 0.63%, while Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that MSTDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTDX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 1.15% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 2.80% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83% | 3.85% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 6.00% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 5.48% | -3.42% |
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKQX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTDX vs. FIKQX - Dividend Comparison
MSTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than FIKQX's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 4.01% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTDX MassMutual Short Duration Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.36% | 2.63% | 2.48% | 1.46% | 1.90% | 4.44% | 3.35% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 2.36% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTDX and FIKQX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKQX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to MSTDX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTDX dropped -13.31% vs FIKQX's -18.53%.
MSTDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTDX and FIKQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer