PortfoliosLab logo
MSSGX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSSGX and TQQQ is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio (MSSGX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSSGX:

1.19

TQQQ:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

MSSGX:

1.77

TQQQ:

0.68

Omega Ratio

MSSGX:

1.22

TQQQ:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

MSSGX:

0.61

TQQQ:

0.13

Martin Ratio

MSSGX:

4.17

TQQQ:

0.33

Ulcer Index

MSSGX:

10.00%

TQQQ:

22.59%

Daily Std Dev

MSSGX:

35.32%

TQQQ:

75.89%

Max Drawdown

MSSGX:

-76.02%

TQQQ:

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

MSSGX:

-50.56%

TQQQ:

-24.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSSGX achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MSSGX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 10.79%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 31.28% annualized return.


MSSGX

YTD

-1.70%

1M

2.23%

6M

-5.77%

1Y

41.81%

3Y*

14.96%

5Y*

8.54%

10Y*

10.79%

TQQQ

YTD

-11.28%

1M

27.55%

6M

-11.83%

1Y

13.32%

3Y*

30.10%

5Y*

28.60%

10Y*

31.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSSGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSSGX vs. TQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSSGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSSGX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSSGX is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSSGX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSSGX is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSSGX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSSGX is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TQQQ is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TQQQ is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio (MSSGX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MSSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSSGX and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MSSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than TQQQ's 1.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSSGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio
1.01%0.99%0.00%0.39%24.63%9.61%17.32%14.40%47.33%3.33%8.82%11.82%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
1.41%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.03%

Drawdowns

MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSSGX drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSGX and TQQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MSSGX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio (MSSGX) is 7.57%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that MSSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...