PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSI vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSI achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 23.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MSI has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 21.41%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 12.58% annualized return.


MSI

1D
0.57%
1M
-6.23%
YTD
7.43%
6M
11.22%
1Y
-0.52%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
21.41%

ET

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
23.30%
6M
21.03%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
24.51%
5Y*
21.98%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSI vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
7.43%-16.17%49.12%23.04%-3.81%61.90%7.35%42.19%29.64%11.44%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
23.30%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%42.96%-44.92%5.88%-17.74%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MSI and ET is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006

0.26

The correlation between MSI and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSI:

$69.00B

ET:

$67.83B

EPS

MSI:

$12.42

ET:

$1.36

PE Ratio

MSI:

33.08

ET:

14.42

PS Ratio

MSI:

5.83

ET:

0.78

PB Ratio

MSI:

27.12

ET:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSI:

$11.87B

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSI:

$5.92B

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSI:

$3.35B

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSI vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSI
MSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSIETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.22

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

2.06

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

4.53

-4.57

MSI vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSI and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSIETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

1.28

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.89

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.36

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.36

-0.12

Drawdowns

MSI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSI drawdown since its inception was -93.60%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSI and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSIETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.60%

-87.81%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.45%

-10.02%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-24.56%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.23%

-25.82%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.81%

-72.82%

+40.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.31%

-3.78%

-13.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-25.75%

-14.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.01%

4.55%

+8.46%

Volatility

MSI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.76%. This indicates that MSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSIETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

5.76%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

11.78%

+7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.74%

16.26%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

24.87%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

35.04%

-9.88%

Dividends

MSI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

MSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than ET's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ET
Energy Transfer LP
6.80%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.12%1.17%0.87%1.16%1.26%1.07%1.55%1.46%1.85%2.14%2.05%2.09%

Financials

MSI vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
2.71B
27.77B
(MSI) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSI vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
50.2%
23.9%
Portfolio components
MSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

MSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

MSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSI and ET have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSI has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to ET (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSI dropped -93.60% vs ET's -87.81%.

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSI and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer