MSFRX vs. AGTHX
MSFRX (MFS Total Return Fund) and AGTHX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A) are both mutual funds - MSFRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by MFS, while AGTHX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 10 years, MSFRX returned 8.08%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for AGTHX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFRX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AGTHX.
Performance
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFRX achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than AGTHX's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFRX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.
MSFRX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
AGTHX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 16.28%
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund | 2.35% | 10.98% | 14.73% | 10.34% | -9.70% | 14.00% | 9.72% | 20.20% | -5.80% | 12.18% |
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | 8.72% | 19.73% | 28.02% | 37.22% | -30.75% | 19.32% | 37.83% | 28.16% | -3.15% | 26.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFRX and AGTHX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFRX and AGTHX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFRX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFRX
AGTHX
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFRX | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.75 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 6.69 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, smaller than the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFRX and AGTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFRX | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.28% | -51.91% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.96% | -13.76% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.56% | -21.57% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | -36.38% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.70% | -36.38% | +11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -1.56% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -9.19% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 3.60% | -1.89% |
Volatility
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) is 2.04%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that MSFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFRX | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 6.79% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.04% | 13.02% | -7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 16.31% | -9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.75% | 20.43% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 19.78% | -9.31% |
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFRX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than AGTHX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison
MSFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, less than AGTHX's 9.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | 9.84% | 10.69% | 8.99% | 7.40% | 4.05% | 8.18% | 4.30% | 7.15% | 11.99% | 7.03% | 6.61% | 8.87% |
MSFRX MFS Total Return Fund | 8.85% | 8.93% | 14.87% | 6.19% | 5.38% | 8.33% | 6.93% | 3.22% | 4.99% | 5.67% | 3.54% | 5.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFRX and AGTHX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGTHX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to MSFRX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFRX dropped -37.28% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.
MSFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFRX and AGTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer