PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFRX vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFRX achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than AGTHX's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFRX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 8.05%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.


MSFRX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.25%
6M
3.43%
YTD
6.34%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
8.05%
ALL TIME*
6.81%

AGTHX

1D
1.92%
1M
-3.25%
6M
3.77%
YTD
4.39%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
6.34%10.98%14.73%10.34%-9.70%14.00%9.72%20.20%-5.80%12.18%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
4.39%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFRX and AGTHX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFRX and AGTHX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFRX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSFRX
MSFRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MSFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFRXAGTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

0.80

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

2.89

+3.84

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFRX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, smaller than the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFRX and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFRXAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-51.91%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.96%

-13.76%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-21.57%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.02%

-36.38%

+19.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

-36.38%

+11.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-5.49%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-9.17%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.80%

-2.08%

Volatility

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) is 2.54%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that MSFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFRXAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

4.82%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.30%

13.65%

-8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

16.90%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.78%

20.52%

-10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

19.76%

-9.31%

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFRX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than AGTHX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFRX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

MSFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than AGTHX's 10.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
10.24%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
8.33%8.93%14.87%6.19%5.38%8.33%6.93%3.22%4.99%5.67%3.54%5.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFRX and AGTHX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGTHX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to MSFRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFRX dropped -37.28% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

MSFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFRX and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer