PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFO vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFO vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.


MSFO

1D
-2.81%
1M
2.02%
YTD
-9.19%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
-4.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
-9.19%15.69%10.34%18.38%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and DIVO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.35

The correlation between MSFO and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFO vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFODIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.36

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

3.10

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.37

11.21

-11.57

MSFO vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFODIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

2.06

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.85

-0.23

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, roughly equal to the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFODIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-30.04%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.29%

-5.95%

-23.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

-0.82%

-15.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-2.61%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.16%

1.64%

+11.52%

Volatility

MSFO vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFODIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

2.01%

+6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

6.88%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

8.97%

+12.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

11.94%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

14.84%

+4.94%

MSFO vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFO vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, more than DIVO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
38.67%33.91%35.15%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFO and DIVO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFO has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 1-year performance, DIVO leads with 18.37% vs -4.82% for MSFO. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 18.37% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 38.67%, compared with 6.42% for DIVO.

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFO and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer