PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSEQX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MSEQXFCNTX
YTD Return8.04%28.62%
1Y Return24.17%38.81%
3Y Return (Ann)-17.61%9.83%
5Y Return (Ann)6.92%18.46%
10Y Return (Ann)11.11%15.03%
Sharpe Ratio0.932.56
Daily Std Dev27.39%15.17%
Max Drawdown-69.48%-99.93%
Current Drawdown-48.39%-98.78%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between MSEQX and FCNTX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MSEQX achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 28.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MSEQX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
1.32%
10.83%
MSEQX
FCNTX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I

Fidelity Contrafund Fund

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
Expense ratio chart for MSEQX: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSEQX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSEQX, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.57
FCNTX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 3.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 14.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0014.38

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MSEQX and FCNTX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
0.93
2.56
MSEQX
FCNTX

Dividends

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%10.70%7.94%21.18%12.71%7.55%4.95%4.46%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
2.48%4.26%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%6.17%3.81%5.33%7.54%7.90%

Drawdowns

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEQX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEQX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
-48.39%
-98.78%
MSEQX
FCNTX

Volatility

MSEQX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 6.30%. This indicates that MSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
8.57%
6.30%
MSEQX
FCNTX