PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCI vs. NDAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSCI Inc. (MSCI) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCI achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than NDAQ's -20.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MSCI has outperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of 23.27%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively lower 15.35% annualized return.


MSCI

1D
0.57%
1M
-11.62%
YTD
-2.01%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
-1.84%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
23.27%

NDAQ

1D
-2.18%
1M
-16.64%
YTD
-20.35%
6M
-21.75%
1Y
-12.64%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
15.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSCI
MSCI Inc.
-2.01%-3.17%7.31%22.90%-23.34%38.14%74.38%77.19%17.95%62.63%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
-20.35%27.19%34.85%-3.66%-11.19%60.13%25.99%33.88%8.21%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCI and NDAQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2007

0.53

The correlation between MSCI and NDAQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSCI:

$40.96B

NDAQ:

$43.93B

EPS

MSCI:

$17.37

NDAQ:

$3.32

PE Ratio

MSCI:

32.13

NDAQ:

23.13

PEG Ratio

MSCI:

1.99

NDAQ:

2.22

PS Ratio

MSCI:

13.09

NDAQ:

5.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSCI:

$3.24B

NDAQ:

$8.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSCI:

$2.68B

NDAQ:

$4.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSCI:

$1.99B

NDAQ:

$3.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCI vs. NDAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCI
MSCI Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NDAQ
NDAQ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NDAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSCI Inc. (MSCI) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCINDAQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.93

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.54

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

-1.25

+0.99

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the NDAQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCI and NDAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCI drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, roughly equal to the maximum NDAQ drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCI and NDAQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCINDAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.06%

-68.48%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.07%

-23.39%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.99%

-23.39%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.74%

-32.84%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.74%

-38.31%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.33%

-23.39%

+10.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.07%

-23.79%

+10.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.23%

10.17%

-2.94%

Volatility

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MSCI Inc. (MSCI) is 8.88%, while Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that MSCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCINDAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

11.58%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.91%

22.52%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.16%

26.27%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.84%

24.29%

+6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.20%

24.40%

+6.80%

Dividends

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison

MSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than NDAQ's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSCI
MSCI Inc.
1.38%1.25%1.07%0.98%0.98%0.59%0.65%0.98%1.30%1.04%1.27%1.11%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.46%1.08%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%

Financials

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MSCI Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
850.80M
2.14B
(MSCI) Total Revenue
(NDAQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSCI vs. NDAQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MSCI Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
83.3%
65.8%
Portfolio components
MSCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported a gross profit of 709.00M and revenue of 850.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.3%.

NDAQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 2.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.

MSCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported an operating income of 456.90M and revenue of 850.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.7%.

NDAQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported an operating income of 657.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

MSCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported a net income of 406.00M and revenue of 850.80M, resulting in a net margin of 47.7%.

NDAQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a net income of 519.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSCI and NDAQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDAQ has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to MSCI (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCI dropped -69.06% vs NDAQ's -68.48%.

MSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCI and NDAQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer