MSAI vs. BENF
MSAI (Infrared Cameras Holdings Inc) and BENF (Beneficient Class A Common Stock) are both stocks. MSAI operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while BENF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past year, MSAI returned -83.24% vs 35.68% for BENF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSAI vs. BENF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSAI achieves a -52.69% return, which is significantly lower than BENF's -45.80% return.
MSAI
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -15.77%
- YTD
- -52.69%
- 6M
- -76.10%
- 1Y
- -83.24%
- 3Y*
- -76.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BENF
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- -45.80%
- 6M
- -17.82%
- 1Y
- 35.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSAI vs. BENF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSAI Infrared Cameras Holdings Inc | -52.69% | -84.35% | -45.07% | -68.22% |
BENF Beneficient Class A Common Stock | -45.80% | 18.03% | -98.09% | -94.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSAI and BENF is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
MSAI:
-$8.39
BENF:
-$63.52
MSAI:
$6.00M
BENF:
-$14.86M
MSAI:
$409.00K
BENF:
-$22.07M
MSAI:
-$6.60M
BENF:
-$76.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSAI vs. BENF — Risk / Return Rank
MSAI
BENF
MSAI vs. BENF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrared Cameras Holdings Inc (MSAI) and Beneficient Class A Common Stock (BENF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSAI | BENF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 0.12 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | 2.97 | -3.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.36 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 0.10 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 0.14 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSAI | BENF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 0.12 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.35 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MSAI vs. BENF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSAI drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, roughly equal to the maximum BENF drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAI and BENF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSAI | BENF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.99% | -99.97% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.16% | -74.24% | -18.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.99% | -99.93% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -95.57% | +43.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 63.85% | 51.69% | +12.16% |
Volatility
MSAI vs. BENF - Volatility Comparison
Infrared Cameras Holdings Inc (MSAI) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to Beneficient Class A Common Stock (BENF) at 17.62%. This indicates that MSAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSAI | BENF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.30% | 17.62% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.18% | 103.95% | -17.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 164.92% | 299.32% | -134.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.63% | 265.52% | -150.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.63% | 265.52% | -150.89% |
Dividends
MSAI vs. BENF - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSAI nor BENF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MSAI vs. BENF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Infrared Cameras Holdings Inc and Beneficient Class A Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MSAI and BENF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSAI has higher volatility (20.30%) compared to BENF (17.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSAI dropped -98.99% vs BENF's -99.97%.
BENF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSAI and BENF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer