MSA vs. PH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH).

Performance

MSA vs. PH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSA vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	2.65%	-2.14%	-0.71%	18.52%	-3.15%	2.14%	19.79%	36.10%	23.61%	13.97%
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation	2.04%	39.54%	39.58%	60.81%	-6.91%	18.30%	34.78%	40.75%	-24.00%	44.91%

Fundamentals

EPS MSA : $10.63 PH : $27.53
PE Ratio MSA : 15.42 PH : 32.52
PEG Ratio MSA : 0.06 PH : 1.37
PS Ratio MSA : 2.29 PH : 5.62
Total Revenue (TTM) MSA : $1.87B PH : $20.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) MSA : $871.11M PH : $7.63B
EBITDA (TTM) MSA : $473.57M PH : $5.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSA achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MSA has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 14.61%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.06% annualized return.

MSA

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: -4.15%
• 1Y: 13.16%
• 3Y*: 8.36%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

PH

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 18.56%
• 1Y: 48.64%
• 3Y*: 40.22%
• 5Y*: 24.76%
• 10Y*: 25.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MSA vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSA

MSA Risk / Return Rank: 56
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

PH

PH Risk / Return Rank: 86
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSA vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSA	PH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.59	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	2.19	-1.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.33	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	2.83	-2.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.80	10.89	-9.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSA vs. PH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the PH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSA and PH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSA	PH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	1.59	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.88	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.80	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.45	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between MSA and PH is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MSA vs. PH - Dividend Comparison

MSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than PH's 0.80% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	1.29%	1.31%	1.21%	1.11%	1.26%	1.16%	1.14%	1.30%	1.58%	1.78%	1.89%	2.92%
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation	0.80%	0.80%	1.00%	1.25%	1.73%	1.25%	1.29%	1.65%	1.97%	1.32%	1.80%	2.60%

Drawdowns

MSA vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSA drawdown since its inception was -70.32%, which is greater than PH's maximum drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA and PH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSA	PH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.32%	-66.92%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-17.77%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.09%	-28.64%	-6.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.39%	-54.68%	+16.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.06%	-12.49%	-6.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-15.35%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.76%	4.61%	+2.15%

Volatility

MSA vs. PH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is 7.73%, while Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that MSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSA	PH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	9.82%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.26%	17.88%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.46%	30.84%	-5.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.43%	28.31%	-3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.73%	31.52%	-2.79%

Financials

MSA vs. PH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MSA Safety Incorporated and Parker-Hannifin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 239.39M and revenue of 510.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.93B and revenue of 5.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

MSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 144.05M and revenue of 510.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.09B and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

MSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 86.93M and revenue of 510.91M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 845.00M and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.