PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MS vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MSPG
YTD Return0.04%12.93%
1Y Return10.45%7.13%
3Y Return (Ann)7.23%9.70%
5Y Return (Ann)17.50%11.80%
10Y Return (Ann)14.51%10.26%
Sharpe Ratio0.340.50
Daily Std Dev24.93%14.09%
Max Drawdown-88.12%-54.23%
Current Drawdown-8.38%0.00%

Fundamentals


MSPG
Market Cap$151.00B$380.67B
EPS$5.50$6.11
PE Ratio16.8826.40
PEG Ratio3.063.28
Revenue (TTM)$54.47B$84.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$46.44B$39.25B
EBITDA (TTM)$428.47M$24.22B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MS and PG is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MS vs. PG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 12.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 14.51%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%2,600.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,597.51%
2,657.11%
MS
PG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Morgan Stanley

The Procter & Gamble Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.89
PG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PG, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.73

MS vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MS and PG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.34
0.50
MS
PG

Dividends

MS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than PG's 2.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MS
Morgan Stanley
3.71%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%0.64%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.34%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%2.78%2.91%

Drawdowns

MS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.38%
0
MS
PG

Volatility

MS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.01%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.74%
4.01%
MS
PG

Financials

MS vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items