PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MS vs. FBGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MS vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
457.69%
858.14%
MS
FBGX

Returns By Period


MS

YTD

49.00%

1M

13.06%

6M

36.04%

1Y

74.42%

5Y (annualized)

26.37%

10Y (annualized)

17.40%

FBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


MSFBGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MS and FBGX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MS vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MS, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.822.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.743.45
The chart of Omega ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.531.57
The chart of Calmar ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.041.74
The chart of Martin ratio for MS, currently valued at 15.88, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.8817.43
MS
FBGX

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.82
2.39
MS
FBGX

Dividends

MS vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.65%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%0.64%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MS vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-1.14%
MS
FBGX

Volatility

MS vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 12.59% compared to UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.59%
0
MS
FBGX