PortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. FBGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MS and FBGX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

MS vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.90%
0
MS
FBGX

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MS

YTD

-20.07%

1M

-16.31%

6M

-6.11%

1Y

11.54%

5Y*

26.12%

10Y*

13.66%

FBGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MS vs. FBGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MS is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MS is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MS is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MS is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MS is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MS is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MS vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
MS: 0.35
FBGX: 1.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
MS: 0.67
FBGX: 1.67
The chart of Omega ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MS: 1.10
FBGX: 1.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for MS, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
MS: 0.37
FBGX: 0.80
The chart of Martin ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
MS: 1.58
FBGX: 5.88


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.35
1.01
MS
FBGX

Dividends

MS vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MS
Morgan Stanley
3.63%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MS vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-29.24%
-1.14%
MS
FBGX

Volatility

MS vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.52%
0
MS
FBGX