PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVI vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVI vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (MRVI) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVI achieves a 48.92% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -22.80% return.


MRVI

1D
0.21%
1M
27.70%
YTD
48.92%
6M
37.89%
1Y
118.02%
3Y*
-28.66%
5Y*
-35.31%
10Y*

ARES

1D
-4.04%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-22.80%
6M
-22.12%
1Y
-24.14%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
20.60%
10Y*
29.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVI vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRVI
Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.
48.92%-40.37%-16.79%-54.23%-65.85%49.38%-6.03%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-22.80%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVI and ARES is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.25

The correlation between MRVI and ARES shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MRVI:

-$0.72

ARES:

$2.83

PS Ratio

MRVI:

3.43

ARES:

4.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVI:

$204.73M

ARES:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVI:

$59.37M

ARES:

$4.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVI:

-$118.27M

ARES:

$2.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVI vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVI
MRVI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MRVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVI Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVI vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (MRVI) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRVIARESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.92

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

-0.49

+4.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

-0.99

+9.87

MRVI vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVI and ARES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRVIARESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

-0.60

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.56

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

0.62

-1.01

Drawdowns

MRVI vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVI drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVI and ARES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVIARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-49.73%

-47.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.93%

-49.05%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.25%

-49.73%

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.16%

-49.73%

-47.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.02%

-35.00%

-57.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.60%

-11.28%

-56.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

24.48%

-11.14%

Volatility

MRVI vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. (MRVI) has a higher volatility of 24.44% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 9.18%. This indicates that MRVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVIARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.44%

9.18%

+15.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.54%

34.82%

+8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.75%

40.54%

+32.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.72%

37.22%

+37.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.52%

36.63%

+36.89%

Dividends

MRVI vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

MRVI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.51%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
MRVI
Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MRVI vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
65.84M
1.53B
(MRVI) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRVI vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
51.2%
96.1%
Portfolio components
MRVI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.70M and revenue of 65.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

MRVI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 720.00K and revenue of 65.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

MRVI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -3.73M and revenue of 65.84M, resulting in a net margin of -5.7%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRVI and ARES have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVI has higher volatility (24.44%) compared to ARES (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVI dropped -97.16% vs ARES's -49.73%.

MRVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVI and ARES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer