MRO vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MRO or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between MRO and SCHG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MRO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MRO:
0.58
SCHG:
2.05
MRO:
1.02
SCHG:
2.68
MRO:
1.12
SCHG:
1.37
MRO:
0.38
SCHG:
2.91
MRO:
2.11
SCHG:
11.49
MRO:
6.95%
SCHG:
3.13%
MRO:
25.29%
SCHG:
17.49%
MRO:
-91.74%
SCHG:
-34.59%
MRO:
-19.34%
SCHG:
-3.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRO achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 35.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MRO has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.70%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
MRO
20.15%
-0.70%
3.39%
18.63%
18.66%
1.70%
SCHG
35.44%
3.33%
10.58%
35.25%
19.99%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MRO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MRO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRO Marathon Oil Corporation | 1.54% | 1.70% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.20% | 1.47% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.16% | 5.40% | 2.83% | 2.04% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
MRO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRO drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRO and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MRO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) is 1.65%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that MRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.