PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MRO vs. CTRA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MROCTRA
YTD Return15.36%12.29%
1Y Return21.19%18.71%
3Y Return (Ann)39.14%28.12%
5Y Return (Ann)11.36%6.20%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.04%-0.51%
Sharpe Ratio0.660.68
Daily Std Dev28.82%24.30%
Max Drawdown-91.74%-74.42%
Current Drawdown-22.56%-12.94%

Fundamentals


MROCTRA
Market Cap$15.72B$20.85B
EPS$2.56$2.13
PE Ratio10.7413.03
PEG Ratio26.4544.67
Revenue (TTM)$6.45B$5.68B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.15B$7.64B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.31B$3.80B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MRO and CTRA is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MRO vs. CTRA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MRO achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than CTRA's 12.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MRO has underperformed CTRA with an annualized return of -1.04%, while CTRA has yielded a comparatively higher -0.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.06%
3.40%
MRO
CTRA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Marathon Oil Corporation

Coterra Energy Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MRO vs. CTRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) and Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MRO, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MRO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MRO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MRO, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MRO, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.71
CTRA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTRA, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTRA, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTRA, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTRA, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTRA, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.89

MRO vs. CTRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which roughly equals the CTRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MRO and CTRA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.66
0.68
MRO
CTRA

Dividends

MRO vs. CTRA - Dividend Comparison

MRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than CTRA's 2.85% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MRO
Marathon Oil Corporation
1.51%1.70%1.18%1.10%1.20%1.47%1.39%1.18%1.16%5.40%2.83%2.04%
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
2.85%4.58%10.13%5.89%2.46%1.87%1.00%0.53%0.31%0.41%0.24%0.14%

Drawdowns

MRO vs. CTRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRO drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, which is greater than CTRA's maximum drawdown of -74.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRO and CTRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-22.56%
-12.94%
MRO
CTRA

Volatility

MRO vs. CTRA - Volatility Comparison

Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) at 4.12%. This indicates that MRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.73%
4.12%
MRO
CTRA

Financials

MRO vs. CTRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marathon Oil Corporation and Coterra Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items