MRGAX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
MRGAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MRGAX or TRLGX.
Performance
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 23.06% return, which is significantly lower than TRLGX's 30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGAX has outperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 12.86%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.
MRGAX
23.06%
3.63%
11.37%
29.72%
14.20%
12.86%
TRLGX
30.92%
3.55%
13.17%
32.96%
14.38%
11.32%
Key characteristics
| MRGAX | TRLGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.46 | 2.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 2.79 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.86 | 1.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.95 | 12.58 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.86% | 2.62% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.09% | 15.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.66% | -56.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.48% | -1.66% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MRGAX and TRLGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while TRLGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRGAX MFS Core Equity Fund | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.39% | 0.16% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.60% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 11.57% | 8.70% | 0.63% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 4.10%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.