PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MRGAX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MRGAX and TRLGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.79%
10.76%
MRGAX
TRLGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MRGAX:

0.97

TRLGX:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

MRGAX:

1.25

TRLGX:

1.89

Omega Ratio

MRGAX:

1.20

TRLGX:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

MRGAX:

1.21

TRLGX:

1.60

Martin Ratio

MRGAX:

3.86

TRLGX:

6.64

Ulcer Index

MRGAX:

3.71%

TRLGX:

3.55%

Daily Std Dev

MRGAX:

14.82%

TRLGX:

17.06%

Max Drawdown

MRGAX:

-53.30%

TRLGX:

-56.16%

Current Drawdown

MRGAX:

-7.33%

TRLGX:

-5.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGAX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 8.83%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


MRGAX

YTD

4.43%

1M

3.19%

6M

3.79%

1Y

13.35%

5Y*

8.55%

10Y*

8.83%

TRLGX

YTD

3.74%

1M

1.93%

6M

10.76%

1Y

22.07%

5Y*

13.37%

10Y*

12.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for MRGAX: current value at 0.93% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.93%
Expense ratio chart for TRLGX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MRGAX vs. TRLGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MRGAX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MRGAX is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MRGAX is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MRGAX is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MRGAX is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MRGAX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRLGX is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MRGAX, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.971.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for MRGAX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.251.89
The chart of Omega ratio for MRGAX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.201.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for MRGAX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.211.60
The chart of Martin ratio for MRGAX, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.866.64
MRGAX
TRLGX

The current MRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGAX and TRLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.97
1.38
MRGAX
TRLGX

Dividends

MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while TRLGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
0.52%0.54%0.65%0.39%0.16%0.37%0.43%0.60%0.54%0.60%11.57%8.70%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.41%0.28%0.24%0.24%0.03%0.07%

Drawdowns

MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.33%
-5.20%
MRGAX
TRLGX

Volatility

MRGAX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 3.95%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.95%
5.43%
MRGAX
TRLGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab